April 26th 2017 9:16 pm | Anticipate This!™ | Patent and Trademark Law Blog
U.S. Pat. No.6,637,447: Beerbrella.
1. A combined beverage container and shading apparatus, comprising: a beverage container, for containing a beverage; a means for removably attaching the apparatus to the beverage container; a shaft, coupled to the means for removably attaching the apparatus, and extending vertically with respect to the beverage container; an umbrella, coupled to the shaft at a point above the means for removably attaching, so as to shade the beverage container, wherein the means for removably attaching comprises a clip provided to attach to the beverage container by means of spring action and friction.
2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the umbrella comprises a small umbrella approximately five to seven inches in diameter.
3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the umbrella comprises a small paper-like umbrella with balsa framing.
4. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the umbrella comprises a solid…
View original post 153 more words
April 7th 2017 11:49 am | Anticipate This!™ | Patent and Trademark Law Blog
U.S. Pat. No. 6,360,693: Animal toy.
JW Note: Many thanks to Brad Bower at Duke University for tipping me off to this one.
An apparatus for use as a toy by an animal, for example a dog, to either fetch carry or chew includes a main section with at least one protrusion extending therefrom that resembles a branch in appearance. The toy is formed of any of a number of materials including rubber, plastic, or wood including wood composites and is solid. It is either rigid or flexible. A flavoring (scent) is added, if desired. The toy is adapted to float by including a material therein that is lighter than water or it is adapted to glow in the dark, as desired, by the addition of a fluorescent material that is either included in the material from which the toy is made or the flourescent material…
View original post 581 more words
April 4th 2017 7:06 pm | Anticipate This!™ | Patent and Trademark Law Blog
Meet registered patent attorney Jake Ward and his staff at Ward Law Office LLC. Jake works alongside his wife and Business Manager, Kristi; Office Manager, Jenn; and Associate Attorney, AJ, in their office on the second floor of the Laird Arcade building, in downtown Tiffin. The patent and trademark law firm opened their doors this January, although Jake has been practicing patent law for over 12 years.
Quite simply, “We help inventors. That’s our job,” Jake explains. They have opened over fifty new cases, with more than ten new clients, since January. The firm represents independent inventors and businesses locally, and across the United States. Local companies include Cooper Tire, Ballreich’s, Ralph’s Joy of Living, and Creative Plastic Concepts. The firm also helps many foreign companies, in countries such as the UK, Brazil, China, Israel, and Canada.
Usually, patent attorneys congregate in large cities, and you pay a premium. …
View original post 359 more words
March 9th 2017 1:56 pm | Anticipate This!™ | Patent and Trademark Law Blog
The Akron Inventor’s Club is hosting a seminar on “Intellectual Property Law for Business and Entrepreneurs” on Thursday, March 9, 2017.
Registered Intellectual Property Attorney Jacob “Jake” Ward will talk about “New Patent Rules for 2017”. Included in talk he’ll explain the different types of intellectual Property, what they cover and how to obtain protection. Jake is a founding partner of Ward Law Office LLC in Tiffin, Ohio. He is also a registered Canadian Patent Agent as well as an adjunct professor at the University of Toledo, College of Law. Jake is also the founding author of the legal blog “Anticipate This!”
[ 5:30 – 6:00 pm ] Doors Open.
[ 6:00 – 6:15 pm ] Introduction by Craig Miloscia from Akron Inventors Club.
[ 6:15 – 7:00 pm ] Jacob “Jake” Ward talk on “New Patent Rules for 2017!”
[ 7:00 – 7:30 pm ] Inventors Forum.
For more information, or to RSVP for the seminar, go to: https://www.meetup.com/Akron-Inventors-Club/
March 1st 2017 3:36 pm | Anticipate This!™ | Patent and Trademark Law Blog
Ward Law Office is pleased to announce that Anthony “AJ” Wenn has joined the firm as an Associate Attorney, effective March 1, 2017. Mr. Wenn is a Registered Patent Attorney and admitted to the bar in Illinois. AJ holds a B.S. in Biological Sciences, with a Minor in Chemistry, from the University of Illinois at Chicago. He received his Juris Doctor from the University of Kentucky College of Law, where he was the Intellectual Property Law Society President, AIPLA Representative, and participated in Intellectual Property Moot Court. He has also previously worked as a Staff Attorney in Columbus, Ohio, performing quality control for large electronic discovery cases. We are pleased to welcome AJ to the growing intellectual property practice at Ward Law Office.
April 10th 2013 6:26 pm | Small Business IP Protection and Management
May 25th 2011 4:44 pm | Small Business IP Protection and Management
Date: Wednesday, June 8, 2011
Time: 2 PM to 3 PM
From the USPTO:
From the USPTO:On April 6, 2010, the USPTO launched the Ombudsman Pilot Program; the purpose of the program is to provide patent applicants with assistance in handling application-processing problems if the normal channels have not been successful. This program has been used by both pro se applicants and applicant’s representatives. We want to ensure that pro se applicants know how to get the most from this Program by focusing on them in this Teleconference.
Join Directors Valencia Martin-Wallace and Joe Thomas to share your comments, thoughts, and questions on how the program works and what it can do for you.
How to Participate: To participate in the call, please RSVP at least 24 hours before the call to: email@example.com.
Participants will receive a return e-mail with the call-in information. Participation is limited to the first 50 who RSVP.
If you are unable to participate in this call, please visit our Web page at: www.uspto.gov for dates of other upcoming teleconferences. Also, if you have a topic of interest for a future call, please send it to: firstname.lastname@example.org
January 3rd 2011 9:30 pm | Small Business IP Protection and Management
It is with a sense of deep sadness that we must report that our partner, mentor, colleague and friend, Donald R. Fraser, passed away on December 28, 2010 in Ft. Myers, Florida after a brief illness. He was 83 years old.
Don Fraser had a distinguished career as a patent attorney that spanned more than 50 years. He was committed to the profession, his clients, the firm and its people, his colleagues, and to his many friends, and was very active in professional, civic, and charitable matters.
He is survived by his wife of over 50 years, Caroline, his son and two grandchildren. His was truly a life well lived and he will be greatly missed.
December 17th 2010 4:31 pm | Small Business IP Protection and Management
For more information, please click here.
September 1st 2010 9:50 pm | Small Business IP Protection and Management
The USPTO has issued updated examination guidelines on the law of "obviousness". For details, see the press release here.
March 13th 2010 3:52 pm | Small Business IP Protection and Management
January 27th 2010 8:15 pm | Small Business IP Protection and Management
It is that time again. Each year we see a large number of hits for people asking "Is MARCH MADNESS considered a trademark? The short answer is yes, as decided by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division in 2003. There is actually a family of registered trademarks owned by the March Madness Athletic Association (MMAA). Who is that you ask? The MMAA is actually a holding company formed by the NCAA and the Illinois High School Association. Sound like an odd combination? Apparently, the IHSA has used the term "March Madness" since 1939 for a state high school basketball tournamnent. For a full history of the term as used by the IHSA, visit the History of March Madness page of the IHSA web site. The NCAA has been using the mark for nearly 25 years.
Also see Wikipedia.
August 20th 2009 1:18 pm | Small Business IP Protection and Management
The USPTO has revealed a new streamlined web site. For a look at the beta vesion of the USPTO web site click here.
February 7th 2009 3:13 pm | Small Business IP Protection and Management
One of the most asked questions we hear is "How do I get a patent?". Although we have posted this before, below is an overview of the important steps in beginning the patent process.
The first step:
One of the most important first steps when something is invented is to make a record of the invention. The record can consist of a simple a written description accompanied by any sketches, drawings, and/or diagrams. The written description does not necessarily have to be long, but should include enough detail to tell what the invention is and how it works. Any sketches, drawings, and/or diagrams which can supplement the written description should be included. The inventor should then sign and date the written description and sketches, drawings, and/or diagrams, and have a witness sign and date the written description and sketches, drawings, and/or diagrams.
What the record of invention does is provide tangible evidence that the inventor actually possessed the invention on the date indicated. It should be noted that other evidence could be used to pre-date this record. This record is important in the United States because a patent is awarded to the first to invent, not the first to apply for a patent. Thus, this record can become very valuable in the future. A copy of the record should be given to your patent attorney to be placed in your file. The record is also very helpful to your attorney in understanding the invention and in beginning preparation of a patent application.
The second step:
Once an inventor has made a record of an invention, the next step is to determine whether the invention is patentable. In order to be patentable, an invention must be new, useful, and unobvious. The new and useful requirements are fairly straight forward. Unobviousness is a little less "obvious". However, we will leave that definition for another day.
To determine patentability, one typically conducts a search of the records of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Although a search is not required, it is highly recommended as it may eliminate unnecessary expenses down the road if an invention is deemed not patentable.
There are essentially three ways to conduct a patentability search.
- One method which can be used to conduct a search is to visit a website maintained by the USPTO which includes a database of all U.S. patents and published U.S. patent applications. A searcher can enter key words and other search terms in order to locate relevant patents. The patents can be viewed in their entirety, and printed if desired. Other web sites are available such as Google Patent for conducting the patentability search.
- Second, a search can be conducted at a Federal Depository Library where patent documents are also made available. These documents can be searched, and quite often, the staff of these libraries is quite helpful in conducting the search. The USPTO website includes an information page about these libraries, and also a listing of these libraries.
- Finally, a patent attorney can conduct the search for you. Typically, either the attorney will visit the USPTO to conduct the search. The attorney may also conduct the search on the USPTO website, but it is typically much more efficient for the attorney, and thus, less costly, to conduct the search at the USPTO.
Once the search has been conducted, the patent documents located can be studied in view of the invention to determine whether the invention appears to be patentable. It should be noted that a Patent Office Examiner will also conduct a search during the patent application process, and may find more pertinent art. Although not foolproof, the patentability search can provide a good indication whether or not the invention is patentable.
Finally, the inventor's third step:
Once it is determined that an invention is patentable, the inventor must determine what type of application will be filed to adequately protect the invention.
There are two general types of patent applications covering the structure or method of an invention which can be considered, a provisional and a utility.
A provisional patent application typically includes a written description and drawing(s) of the invention. The provisional patent application is given a filing date and a serial number, but is not examined by the Patent Office. The formal requirements are less stringent for the provisional patent application than a regular patent application and the Government filing fee is lower. Although not required, at least one claim is typically included. If the provisional patent application is converted to a utility patent application within one year of its filing date, the later filed application may obtain the benefit of the filing date of the earlier-filed application.
The filing of a provisional application provides an inventor with the comfort of having the disclosure lodged in the United States Patent and Trademark Office and provides the inventor a year to improve the invention, seek licensees, seek investment capital, test the market, etc. The provisional application will not mature into a patent.
A utility patent application has more stringent requirements than the provisional. The utility application typically includes a more detailed written description (including a full set of claims defining the metes and bounds of the invention sought to be protected) and formal drawings of the invention.
The Government filing fee for the utility patent application is higher than a provisional patent application, and the costs of preparation are typically higher as well. A Patent Office Examiner examines the utility patent application. If the invention is found to be patentable, the utility application will mature into a patent. The term of a utility patent is 20 years from the date of application.
A design patent application can also be considered. A design patent covers the overall ornamental appearance of an invention, but the protection afforded by a design patent is typically narrower than that of a utility patent. However, both a design patent application and a provisional or utility patent application can be filed for a single invention if desired. The term of the design patent is 14 years from the date of issue.
As soon as a provisional, utility, or design patent application is filed, any documentation, sketches, drawings or the like may be marked with "pat. pending", "pat. applied for", or the like.
The above steps in the patent process should give inventors a general idea of the patent process. Although other factors may impact patentability, enforceability, and the like, this process can be used as a guide for most inventions.